NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 21578
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 21578
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3652
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3652
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5714 vs 3290
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5714 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 861 vs 812
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19305 vs 15107
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 861 vs 812 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19305 vs 15107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10045 | 0 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 861 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 | 19305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 147323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 108 | 105 |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |