NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 51% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10255 vs 6789
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 17328
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 17328
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 vs 6789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 17328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3652
- 138.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 58
- 138.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | 6789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 8055 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11566 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76247 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 183 | 180 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAL4
