NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega II videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 16149
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 16149
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 3100
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 3100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs Dec 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 16149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 16149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 3100 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 48.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2813 vs 58
- 48.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2813 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 16149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 16149 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 2813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 2813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99395 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Code name | TU104 | Vega 20 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | Dec 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 181 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1574 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 110.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 440.3 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 475 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13230 million |
| Compute units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 825.3 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
