NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1246 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 678.2x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 11451
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 11451
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 3555
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 3555
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1246 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 3555 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3072
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 55.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3198 vs 58
- 55.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3198 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3198 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3198 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU104 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 209 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1246 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
