NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1920
- Around 83% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10786 vs 5906
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 17150
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 17150
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1920 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 vs 5906 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 17150 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 | 5906 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 17150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU106B |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 204 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
