AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

  • Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3652
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3652
  • 347.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 58
  • 347.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 58
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 vs 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 vs 58

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1257 MHz
  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 5140
  • 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 5140
  • 2.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10794 vs 4431
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1365 MHz vs 1257 MHz
Boost clock speed 1560 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Texture fill rate 299.5 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20291 vs 5140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20291 vs 5140
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10794 vs 4431

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5140
20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6839
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20161
58
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
4431
10794
Name AMD Radeon RX 590 GME NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark 659
PassMark - G3D Mark 8575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5140 20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5140 20291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6839 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6839 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 20161 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 20161 58
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4431 10794

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 590 GME NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Turing
Code name Polaris 20 TU104
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
Launch date 9 Mar 2020 2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating 206 203
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1560 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1257 MHz 1365 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS 9.585 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 44.16 GPixel/s 99.84 GPixel/s
Render output units 32
Stream Processors 2304
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Units 144
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 175 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 5700 million 13600 million
Pipelines 3072

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 450 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
Width Dual-slot Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.2
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR6

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support