NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10821 vs 6273
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 16952
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 16952
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10821 vs 6273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 16952 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3652
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 58
- 57.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10821 | 6273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3355 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12907 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU116 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 213 | 214 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |