NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 110 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13605 vs 11759
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 570 vs 506
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 19529
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3715
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 19529
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3715
- Around 12% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8346 vs 7438
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13605 vs 11759 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 vs 506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3715 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 vs 7438 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13605 | 11759 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 506 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 93962 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8346 | 7438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 125 | 171 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1110 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 207.4 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

