NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19225 vs 12860
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 vs 599
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27846 vs 20983
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27846 vs 20983
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed 1650 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed 1815 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 19225 vs 12860
PassMark - G2D Mark 918 vs 599
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27846 vs 20983
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27846 vs 20983

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 24510 vs 3709
  • 16x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 53660 vs 3352
  • 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 24510 vs 3709
  • 16x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 53660 vs 3352
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 24510 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 53660 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 24510 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 53660 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
19225
12860
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
918
599
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27846
20983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
24510
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
53660
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27846
20983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
24510
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
53660
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 19225 12860
PassMark - G2D Mark 918 599
Geekbench - OpenCL 109712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 354.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4359.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 193.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1655.184
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27846 20983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 24510
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 53660
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27846 20983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 24510
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 53660
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU106
Launch date 23 July 2019 29 January 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Place in performance rating 6 3
Type Desktop Laptop
Price now $489.99
Value for money (0-100) 49.06

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1815 MHz 1440 MHz
Core clock speed 1650 MHz 1215 MHz
CUDA cores 3072
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 89 C
Pipelines 3072 2304
Render output units 64
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Port 1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4
Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 6 pin + 8 pin
Width 2-Slot
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 496 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready