NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 vs 12357
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 602
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 18604
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 18604
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 vs 12357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 18604 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3355
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3355
- 3696.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7393 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | 12357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 602 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 7393 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 23 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 110 | 121 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1215 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 496 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |