NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 827
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 25820
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 25820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 19611
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 117339
- 7582x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 19611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 117339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19611 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 | 138072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $2,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 109 | 90 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4608 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 496 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
