NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 831
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 25820
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 25820
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 831 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20221 vs 19538
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 115519
- 1902x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3804 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20221 vs 19538 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 115519 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3804 vs 2 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19538 | 20221 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 831 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 | 138072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 3804 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $2,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 108 | 106 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4608 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 496 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
