NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1304 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1442 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21737 vs 16374
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 932 vs 847
• Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136942 vs 88540
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 393.982 vs 355.937
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 4858.771
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 25.191
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 174.185 vs 144.928
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1991.116 vs 1056.078
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 16640
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 16640

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100

• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3718
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3358
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3718
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	21737 16374
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	932 847
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	136942 88540
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	393.982 355.937
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5461.22 4858.771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	41.104 25.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.185 144.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1991.116 1056.078
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23659 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 22133
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23659 16640
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 13211
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 22133

Compare specifications (specs)