NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 9.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21737 versus 16374
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 932 versus 847
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 136942 versus 88540
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 393.982 versus 355.937
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 4858.771
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 25.191
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 174.185 versus 144.928
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1991.116 versus 1056.078
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 16640
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 16640
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21737 versus 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 932 versus 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136942 versus 88540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 393.982 versus 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1991.116 versus 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 235 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 3718
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 3358
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 3718
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21737 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 932 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136942 | 88540 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 393.982 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1991.116 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14584 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU102 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 91 | 92 |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 921.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |