NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1156 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1247 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 1 October 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1156 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1247 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
- Around 39% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2944
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2944 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 1 October 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 105 | not rated |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,215 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 319.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 152 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB / s |