NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20491 vs 18798
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 990 vs 905
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 103974
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4829.953 vs 3938.377
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 31.684
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 25500
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 25500
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11689 vs 10935
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20491 vs 18798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 vs 905 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 103974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 vs 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 31.684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 25500 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11689 vs 10935 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 vs 323.141
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 150.943
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 1477.456
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3717
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3360
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3717
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20491 | 18798 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 990 | 905 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 103974 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11689 | 10935 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 99 | 100 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |