NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 106315 vs 105219
- Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2572 vs 1752
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106315 vs 105219 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2572 vs 1752 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 784
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 vs 17813
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 vs 784 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 vs 17813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 908 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17813 | 18750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106315 | 105219 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2572 | 1752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 102 | 105 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.60 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 135.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |