NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 810 MHz
- 9668.2x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 2304 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 225
- 18.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 681
- 20.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 2473
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 15 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 225 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 681 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 2473 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 90 Watt
- Around 3% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 225 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 681 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 2473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
Code name | GA107 | GF108 |
Launch date | 2022 | 15 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 1440 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
Price now | $99.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |