NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1708 MHz
- 937.9x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 444
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 8160
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 31098
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 15 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1708 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 444 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 8160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 31098 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 444 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 8160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 31098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP106B |
Launch date | 2022 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 385 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 120 Watt |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |