NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 941 vs 782
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12845 vs 11691

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1740 MHz
• 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57151 vs 50117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	941 782
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12845 11691
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50117 57151

Compare specifications (specs)