NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 941 vs 813

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1740 MHz
• 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 vs 12843
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 50117

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	941 813
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12843 12931
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50117 61407

Compare specifications (specs)