NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 646
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 646 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 206.4 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15425 vs 12873
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 92447 vs 49719
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 206.4 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15425 vs 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 92447 vs 49719 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 646 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 15425 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49719 | 92447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 449.647 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4619.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.308 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.818 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1410.887 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13334 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 24877 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 11471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13334 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA107 | GA104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 81 | 84 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | 103.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 206.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |