NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 633 MHz
- 2476.3x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 50.6 GTexel / s
- 9.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 219 Watt
- 4.6x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 896 MB
Launch date | 2022 vs 16 February 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 633 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 50.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 240 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 896 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 2268 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 2268 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | GT200B |
Launch date | 2022 | 16 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 633 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 240 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 50.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 219 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 896 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 127.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 448 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2268 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |