NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- 3332.2x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 3584 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 961 vs 292
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16857 vs 4463
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2021 vs 1 February 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 961 vs 292 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16857 vs 4463 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2084 vs 1997
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 vs 1997 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1997 | 2084 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 961 | 292 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16857 | 4463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP106B |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2021 | 1 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 74 | 595 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 59.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |