NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 16849
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3374
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 16849
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3374
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3374 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3840
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 13253
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 vs 589
- Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 vs 78982
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 330.903
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 26.167
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 143.293
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 979.608
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3689 vs 1821
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 153.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3840 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 vs 13253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 vs 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 vs 78982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 330.903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 26.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 143.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 979.608 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 vs 1821 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13253 | 25004 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 1025 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78982 | 154220 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 330.903 | 578.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 52.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 143.293 | 291.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 2700.97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3374 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1821 | 3689 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 144 | 71 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1282 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 817 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 72 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |