NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs AMD FireStream 9370

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2330.3x more texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 66.0 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1600
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13388 vs 2528

Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 817 MHz
• 3.1x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 763 vs 589

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13388 2528
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 763

Compare specifications (specs)