NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1282 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13253 vs 6514
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 589 vs 336
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78982 vs 39228
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 9780
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 2168
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 1982
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 9780
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 2168
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 1982

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 817 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 74% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 1821

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13253 6514
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 336
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78982 39228
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 9780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 1982
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1821 3172

Compare specifications (specs)