NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 330.3x more texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 328.391 vs 270.561
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.733 vs 20.669
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 4193
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 15401
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3716
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 4193
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 7 December 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 328.391 vs 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.733 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 4193 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20187 vs 13307
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 924 vs 589
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155834 vs 79065
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 3384.051
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 25.824
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 972.722
- Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13249 vs 8265
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20187 vs 13307 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 924 vs 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155834 vs 79065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 vs 3384.051 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 25.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 972.722 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 vs 8265 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13307 | 20187 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 924 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79065 | 155834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 328.391 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3384.051 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.824 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.733 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 972.722 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8265 | 13249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA106 | GV100 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 143 | 146 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1282 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Core clock speed | 817 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |