NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 627 vs 589
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14431 vs 13307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 vs 589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14431 vs 13307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79065 vs 74322
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8265 vs 8192
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79065 vs 74322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8265 vs 8192 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 589 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14431 | 13307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74322 | 79065 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8192 | 8265 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 328.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3384.051 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 972.722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA106 |
Launch date | 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 140 | 143 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1282 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 817 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 9.846 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 61.54 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 153.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |