NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 325.878 vs 251.703
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3350
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 17 October 2018 |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 vs 251.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16147 vs 13352
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 591
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87875 vs 78870
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 vs 3461.767
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 vs 26.167
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 vs 152.172
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 vs 979.608
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 21278
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 21278
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8850 vs 8230
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16147 vs 13352 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 vs 591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87875 vs 78870 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 vs 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 vs 26.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 vs 152.172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 vs 979.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 21278 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 vs 8230 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13352 | 16147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | 820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78870 | 87875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 152.172 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8230 | 8850 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 17 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 143 | 145 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1282 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Core clock speed | 817 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |