NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 350.8x more texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 406
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 152.172 vs 73.167
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 vs 16337
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3360
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 vs 16337
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 21 June 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 152.172 vs 73.167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 vs 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 vs 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3840
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 13355
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 174394 vs 78652
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 325.878
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 3461.767
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 26.167
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 979.608
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1312 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 vs 13355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 174394 vs 78652 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 vs 325.878 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 vs 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 vs 26.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 vs 979.608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13355 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78652 | 174394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 152.172 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
Code name | GA106 | GV100 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 21 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 144 | 143 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1282 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 817 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |