NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 215 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 339.841 vs 293.508
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3359
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3718
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3359
• 1176.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8234 vs 7

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 817 MHz
• Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1282 MHz
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 13387
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 589
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 79058
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3898.264
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 27.109
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 155.642
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1167.569
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 21278
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 21278

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13387 18252
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	589 885
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	79058 99847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	339.841 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3898.264 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.109 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.642 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1167.569 1438.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21278 25232
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8913 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8054 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8234 7

Compare specifications (specs)