NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 325.878 vs 293.508
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3359
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3359
- 1175.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8230 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 vs 293.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8230 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18231 vs 13355
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 881 vs 590
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99350 vs 78652
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3461.767
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 26.167
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 152.172
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 979.608
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 21278
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 21278
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18231 vs 13355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 881 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99350 vs 78652 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 26.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 152.172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 979.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 21278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13355 | 18231 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 881 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78652 | 99350 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 152.172 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8230 | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 144 | 142 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1282 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 817 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready | ||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI |