NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 8827
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 767
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 39028
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 116.142
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1022.932
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 9.235
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 84.034
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 607.721
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3695
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3695
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1005
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1005 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 341 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |