NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

versus

AMD Radeon RX 580

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1257 MHz
Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1340 MHz
Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 192.96 GTexel/s
2.1x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2304
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 8827
Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 767
2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 39028
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 116.142
4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1022.932
3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 9.235
Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 84.034
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 607.721
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 11281
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3695
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 11281
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3695
2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1005

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020 versus 18 April 2017
Vitesse du noyau	1410 MHz versus 1257 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1665 MHz versus 1340 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	253.1 GTexel/s versus 192.96 GTexel/s
Pipelines	4864 versus 2304
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 14 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394 versus 8827
PassMark - G2D Mark	989 versus 767
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075 versus 39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141 versus 116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579 versus 1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311 versus 9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943 versus 84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189 versus 607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478 versus 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478 versus 11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 versus 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671 versus 1005

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580

Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 185 Watt versus 200 Watt
4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	185 Watt versus 200 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	8000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

20394

8827

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

989

767

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

109075

39028

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

323.141

116.142

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4756.579

1022.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

35.311

9.235

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

150.943

84.034

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.189

607.721

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

11281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

11281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3349

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2671

1005

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394	8827
PassMark - G2D Mark	989	767
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075	39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141	116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579	1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311	9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943	84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189	607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478	11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478	11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671	1005

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX 580
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	GA104	Polaris 20
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020	18 April 2017
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$399	$229
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	104	341
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		Radeon RX 500 Series
Génération GCN		4th Gen
Prix maintenant		$169.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		76.21
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1665 MHz	1340 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1410 MHz	1257 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4864	2304
Pixel fill rate	133.2 GPixel/s	42.88 GP/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	253.1 GTexel/s	192.96 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	185 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	5,700 million
Unités de Compute		36
Performance á point flottant		6.2 TFLOPs
Render output units		32
Stream Processors		2304
Texture Units		144
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	242 mm (9.5 inches)	241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt	500 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	1x 8-pin
Largeur	112 mm (4.4 inches)
Bridgeless CrossFire
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448 GB/s	256 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	8000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready