NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 19% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 4096
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 345 Watt
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 19324
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 19324

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 7 August 2017
Core clock speed	1410 MHz vs 1406 MHz
Pipelines	4864 vs 4096
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt vs 345 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478 vs 19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478 vs 19324

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1665 MHz
Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1677 MHz vs 1665 MHz
Texture fill rate	429.30 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
Memory clock speed	1890 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 vs 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 vs 3360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

19324

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3723

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

19324

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3723

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3362

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394
PassMark - G2D Mark	989
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478	19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478	19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Code name	GA104	Vega 10
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	7 August 2017
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$699
Place in performance rating	104	215
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Design		Radeon RX Vega Series
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	1677 MHz
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	1406 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)	840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)	26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS	13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines	4864	4096
Pixel fill rate	133.2 GPixel/s	107.30 GP/s
Texture fill rate	253.1 GTexel/s	429.30 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	345 Watt
Transistor count	17400 million	12,500 million
Compute units		64
Floating-point performance		13.7 TFLOPs
Render output units		64
Stream Processors		4096
Texture Units		256
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	242 mm (9.5 inches)	282 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	1000 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	2x 8-pin
Width	112 mm (4.4 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	483.8 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	2048 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1890 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore