NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 989.4x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2432
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 14696
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 876
- Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 55424
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 182.11
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1797.792
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 14.071
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 26.444
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1035.984
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3638
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 16128
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3638
- Around 82% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 November 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2432 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 14696 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 876 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 16128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 250 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |