NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 930 vs 751
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19684 vs 13832
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 120258 vs 70478
- Around 56% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11856 vs 7603
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 930 vs 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19684 vs 13832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 120258 vs 70478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11856 vs 7603 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 930 | 751 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19684 | 13832 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 120258 | 70478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11856 | 7603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.8 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8056 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8056 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 6 | 38 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |