NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20567 vs 14150
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 998 vs 751
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107393 vs 70387
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 313.695 vs 220.337
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4580.983 vs 3131.344
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 21.852
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 137.972 vs 135.923
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1141.283
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 20094
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 20094
- Around 55% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11644 vs 7491
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20567 vs 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 vs 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107393 vs 70387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 313.695 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4580.983 vs 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.994 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 137.972 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11644 vs 7491 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3360
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20567 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107393 | 70387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 313.695 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4580.983 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.994 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 137.972 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11644 | 7491 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 99 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |