NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2176
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 16476
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 856
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 87635
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 241.214
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 3870.683
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 27.021
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1269.445
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 20969
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 20969
- 1335.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 July 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2176 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 16476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 87635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 241.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 3870.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 1269.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 20969 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 vs 150.943
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 vs 3360
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3717
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 vs 150.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 16476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 856 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 87635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 241.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3870.683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 160.92 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1269.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 148 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2176 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 10.8 B |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.0” (228.60mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |