NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- 784.1x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s
- Around 36% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20549 vs 16374
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 847
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107152 vs 84757
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 25.191
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1477.456 vs 1056.078
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 16640
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 322.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 3584 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 vs 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 vs 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 vs 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 vs 311.869
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 4657.322
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 144.928 vs 125
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 3717
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 3360
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 3717
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 vs 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 144.928 vs 125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP100 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 101 | 87 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 322.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 921.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |