NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla M10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1306 MHz
- 559.7x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 4x 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 3046
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 385
- 10.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 10282
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 46.191
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 814.192
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 50.918
- 8.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 180.026
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3693
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3306
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 5204
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3693
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1306 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 4x 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 3046 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 10282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Maximum memory size | 4x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla M10 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 3046 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 385 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 10282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 46.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 814.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 50.918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 180.026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 5204 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla M10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Code name | GA104 | GM107 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 626 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 4x 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 1,870 million |
Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 4x 83.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |