NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 702.2x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 187.5x more memory clock speed: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 55548
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 150.103
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 2036.763
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 14.035
- 6.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 27.417
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 819.934
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 20151
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 20151
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1771 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 20151 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3356
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3717
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3356
- 3.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7209 vs 1961
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 vs 1961 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 7209 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 15 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $499.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 134 | 254 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
