NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2944
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 12983
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 522
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 84332
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 3676.805
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 22.75
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 162.692
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 1116.69
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 19139
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 19139
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2944 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 12983 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 84332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 297.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 162.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 19139 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3356
- 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7784 vs 1960
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 vs 1960 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 12983 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 84332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 297.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 162.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8060 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1960 | 7784 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU104B |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 137 | 139 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |