NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Around 87% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 14119
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 746
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 71402
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 217.04
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 3119.736
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 21.707
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 133.975
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 1141.283
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 20094
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 20094
- Around 58% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 7 January 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 20094 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3356
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU106 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 161 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |