NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 12868 vs 8897
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 12868 vs 8897
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20579 vs 8004
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20579 vs 8004
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 vs 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 vs 8004 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 5120
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 26458
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 26458
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 5120 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 26458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 26458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26458 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26458 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 12868 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 12868 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20579 | 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20579 | 8004 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14955 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 45 | 56 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 124.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 290 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |