NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 3840
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23672 vs 22313
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 973
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138726 vs 126207
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 41.585
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 16162
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3373
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 16162
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3373
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 3840 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23672 vs 22313 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138726 vs 126207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 41.585 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 290 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 342.287
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 146.214
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1807.647
- Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16306 vs 14958
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1807.647 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 vs 14958 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23672 | 22313 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 973 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138726 | 126207 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 432.118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 41.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 383.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 2280.457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3373 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14958 | 16306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $579 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 76 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 2105 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |