NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 5888
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23668 vs 22412
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 999
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138741 vs 124864
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 40.794
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1634.218
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14955 vs 13608
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 vs 5888 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 vs 22412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138741 vs 124864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1634.218 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14955 vs 13608 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 vs 342.287
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 vs 146.214
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 31420
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 8897
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 8004
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 31420
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 8897
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 8004
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 vs 146.214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 8004 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 | 22412 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138741 | 124864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14955 | 13608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA104 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 41 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |