NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Texturfüllrate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Etwa 4% höhere Leitungssysteme: 6144 vs 5888
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 vs 22253
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 999
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137664 vs 123479
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 40.757
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1664.554
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3478 vs 3163
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 vs 5888 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 vs 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 vs 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1664.554 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 vs 3163 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 32% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 220 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 342.287
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 146.214
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 31420
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 8897
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 8004
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 31420
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 8897
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 8004
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 146.214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 8004 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 | 3163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 66 | 44 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 290 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 608.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |