NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 339.8 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5888
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23668 versus 22408
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 999
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138689 versus 122948
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 40.757
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 versus 1664.554
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14960 versus 13614
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 5888 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 versus 22408 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138689 versus 122948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 versus 1664.554 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 versus 13614 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 290 Watt
- Environ 47% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 342.287
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 146.214
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 31420
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 8897
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 8004
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 31420
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 8897
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 8004
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 290 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 146.214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 8004 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23668 | 22408 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138689 | 122948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 | 13614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 42 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 608.3 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |