NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 vs 20002
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 vs 20002
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 Apr 2020
Core clock speed 1110 MHz vs 930 MHz
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
Pipelines 6144 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26295 vs 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26295 vs 20002

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 115 Watt
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 9367
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 8604
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 9367
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 8604
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 W vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 10384 vs 9367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10130 vs 8604
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 10384 vs 9367
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10130 vs 8604

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26295
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9367
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8604
10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26295
20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9367
10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8604
10130
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 371.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3552.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 190.723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1422.602
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 26295 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 9367 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8604 10130
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 26295 20002
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 9367 10384
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8604 10130
PassMark - G3D Mark 13930
PassMark - G2D Mark 632
Geekbench - OpenCL 68337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7353

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA104 TU104B
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating 93 116
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1080 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS 5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines 6144 2560
Pixel fill rate 148.3 GPixel/s 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 172.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 80 W
Transistor count 17400 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready