NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.4x more pipelines: 8704 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25317 vs 18252
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 885
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167693 vs 99847
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 293.508
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 4045.784
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 29.145
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 158.103
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1438.826
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 25232
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 25232
- 2529.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17706 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25317 vs 18252 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 vs 99847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 25232 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 320 Watt
- 11.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25317 | 18252 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167693 | 99847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA102 | TU104 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 52 | 133 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |