NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 8704 versus 2560
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 10 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25308 versus 18254
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 versus 886
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 167437 versus 99973
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 293.508
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 4045.784
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 versus 29.145
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 158.103
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 1438.826
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 25232
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 25232
- 2529.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17709 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 2 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 2560 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 10 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25308 versus 18254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 versus 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167437 versus 99973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 25232 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17709 versus 7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 49% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 320 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25308 | 18254 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167437 | 99973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17709 | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 52 | 134 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13.6 B |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-Slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 760.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |