NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 4.7x more pipelines: 7168 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2x 2 GB
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 vs 30 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Pipelines | 7168 vs 1536 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2x 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Around 69% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1180 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 29969 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 192400 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4627 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
Code name | AD104 | |
Launch date | 8 Jan 2024 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 23 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2475 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1980 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 7168 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 198.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 554.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 2x 2540 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Verde Drivers |